The Liberal Media Owes all Conservative Groups an Apology

As tragic as the Boston Bombings were there is something very disturbing about the Liberal Media’s attempts to speculate that this tragedy came at the hands of Right wing Groups.  They repeatedly suggest that it might have been another Oklahoma type domestic terrorist act.  One has to wonder how it is that they did not suggest that maybe, just maybe it was another Weather Underground type bombing by the likes of Bill Ayers, who was bombing police stations and Government Offices in the 60′s and 70′s.   I for one am sick and tired of having the Liberal Media tainting our news with their bias opinions rather then just reporting the facts as they know them at any given time. 

ANY QUESTIONS?

Related articles

• Bill Ayers’ Bombings No Different Than Bombings in Boston (breitbart.com)
• Who Cares What Color The Bombers Are? (armyvetchic.wordpress.com)
• Boston Marathon bombs similar to Bill Ayers’ Weather Underground nail bomb (illinoisreview.typepad.com)
• Liberal commentator: we ‘made a decision’ not to cover Gosnell to protect abortion (lifesitenews.com)
• “Right Wing Extremists” blamed for Boston bombing (lamplightnews.wordpress.com)
• Liberal Media Already Knows Marathon Bomber is a ‘Right Winger’ (athomesense.com)
• Salon Hopes Boston Bomber Turns Out to be a White American (wakinguphumanity.wordpress.com)
• Perkins: Sexual Liberalism Caused Boston (joemygod.blogspot.com)
• Liberal MSM Already Blaming the Right for Boston Marathon Explosion (1800politics.com)
• Fox’s The Five Hosts Go After ‘Liberal Media’ For Trying To Pin Boston Bombings On ‘Right-Wing Radicals’ (mediaite.com)

Media Silent: Are those Rich Democrats paying their Fair Share of Taxes?

Yep, Al Gore sold his Television Network to AL-JAZEERA instead of Glenn Beck for one reason and one reason only.

To avoid paying Taxes to the

United States Government!

So what about all the other Rich Democrats?  Seems the Media has nothing to say about them.

Demand Truth from the Media

ANY QUESTIONS?

Related articles

• Gore’s Al Jazeera Deal Now a Major Scandal (gulagbound.com)
• Busted: WH staffers aren’t paying their ‘fair share’ (theblaze.com)
• Lawsuit over Gore’s Al Jazeera deal raises more disturbing questions (worldtribune.com)
• Gore sued over Current TV sale to Al-Jazeera (wfaa.com)
• Al Gore sued over sale of Current TV to Al-Jazeera (foxnews.com)
• Gore sued over Current TV sale to Al-Jazeera (sfgate.com)

 

RT – Are you Fed Up with Media Bias? Send them a Message by Turning them Off March 12th.

Welcome to Barack Obama’s Utopian America

As I read the curiosities of folks concerning Obama’s actions I am continually amazed at the surprise
and horror that folks arrive at for their observations

Didn’t you all know the direction of Obama as he said them before he was elected?

Did you not realize his thinking hinged on the fact that he didn’t think that the constitution favored the power of the
federal government enough?

You didn’t know that fact?

He said clearly he thought the constitutions protection of individual liberty was in need of change that sided towards government authority.

Why do you suppose he wanted these changes? Well that is simple enough, he wanted more power for wealth redistribution.

What did you think that meant?

What you don’t clearly see for what is coming is the removal of liberty from individuals by taking power in the machinery of the federal government moves us closer to a one world governance.

Doesn’t this make sense?

When you see our wealth going to third world nations don’t you realize that our control is lowered while the third world nation is elevated?

When you see a diminishing of or military does it occur to you that it becomes easier for us to be subjugated to others’ will?

Oh wait I see why it is you haven’t come to know this: You digest what the media wants you to know.

Don’t you realize that the media who sold us Obama is interested in broadcasting to more viewers. If they go from a national broadcasting position to an international position what happens? More ratings and more money!

Obama would love for nothing more than to deliver the authority of the US Government to a Global Authority where he and his cronies could control the world.

None of this makes sense to you? Why does the Obama Administration want to undo, both the first and second amendments of the constitution?

He wants to get rid of God and Guns… Isn’t that clear? Without God’s authority he becomes God. Without guns nobody stands in his way.

Did Americans go to sleep one night and wake up critically thinking challenged?

When did it become a good idea to participate in something like #OWS?

Those desiring what Obama intended to do are clearly dangerous people because of their weak-minded manner of understanding the responsibility of freedom.

Who in their right mind thinks Obama has any clue as how to meet a payroll?

Since when did a community organizer understand and master the intricacies of profitable investing?

Since when did a non practicing lawyer ever be a good choice for a capital defense argument?

Most folks who wanted Obama, wanted him because they didn’t use their critical thinking apparatus.

What they did use is their desire function or emotive need.

I have no time for folks that demand fairness in governance. I value equal opportunity, not affirmative action.

If you are surprised at what Obama has been doing, then maybe the problem isn’t Obama.

He has done all he said he was going to do.

Maybe the problem is you and your habits of listening to the whores in media that want greater profits worldwide for selling you the biggest package of nonsense sold since the days of the wonder lotions pimped in the old days of western frontier days.

I knew what Obama was all about and he hasn’t surprised me one bit. Self proclaimed smart Americans have surprised me though. I don’t consider anyone to be smart who sided with Utopian thinking or the motivations of Obama.

Hat Tip to USAMUTT for this Article

http://www.usamutt.com/blog/post.asp?post_id=8976&ref=8976

Obama Voters

Will the Liberal Media hand Barack Obama yet another Election?

CBS Doesn’t Air Obama Admitting Mistakes in Campaign Ads

“President Obama says some of his campaign ads might ‘go overboard’ or contain mistakes, but most of them simply highlight the differences between him and Gov. Romney.”

“Look, the fact-checkers have had problems with the ads on both sides,” Kroft says to Obama in the unaired clip, “and say they’ve been misleading and in some cases just not true. Does that disturb you? I mean, some of them are your ads.”

Obama responds: “Do we see sometimes us going overboard in our campaign, are there mistakes that are made, areas where there is no doubt somebody could dispute how we are presenting things? You know, that happens in politics.”

Kroft responds: “Aren’t the American entitled to the truth? Or a better version of it?”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/cbs-doesnt-air-obama-admitting-mistakes-campaign-ads_652973.html

ANY QUESTIONS?

ZING: Hit the Road Barack Newsweek Cover Author Niall Ferguson Destroys Critics

Hat tip to The Blaze and Mytheos Holt for this story

Author of ‘Hit the Road’ Newsweek Cover Story Skewers His Critics

Being a conservative in any predominately liberal environment is difficult. Being a conservative at Newsweek is likely prohibitively difficult. And being the conservative whose message lands on Newsweek’s cover seemed, until this week, to be nigh impossible.

Enter Niall Ferguson, the rogue columnist responsible for the recent Newsweek cover story calling for President Obama to be voted out of office. Ferguson’s article has been slammed by several different sources for what those sources claim are factual inaccuracies and/or arguments in bad faith. Ferguson first acknowledged these attacks when he hit back against New York Times columnist Paul Krugman for misconstruing an argument that Ferguson had made about the Congressional Budget Office.

Well, now Ferguson has extended his attack beyond Krugman to the entire academic Left in a blistering four page blog entry countering numerous claims that Ferguson considers unfair. Most of the entry gets very deeply into the policy weeds, and if you want to read them all, you can look at Ferguson’s full take-down here. However, we do want to call your attention to the end, where he mockingly hands out “prizes” to his critics for specific varieties of ridiculousness:

First prize goes to Berkeley professor Brad DeLong, whose blog opened with the headline “Fire-His-Ass-Now.” “He lied,” rants DeLong. “Convene a committee at Harvard to examine whether he has the moral character to teach at a university.” My own counter-suggestion would be to convene a committee at Berkeley to examine whether or not Professor DeLong is spending too much of his time blogging when he really should be conducting serious research or teaching his students. For example, why hasn’t Professor DeLong published that economic history of the 20th century he’s been promising for the past six years? It can’t be writer’s block, that’s for sure.

Runner up is James Fallows of The Atlantic for his hilariously pompous post “As a Harvard Alum, I Apologize.” Well, as an Oxford alum, I laugh.

In third place comes Krugman with his charge of “unethical commentary … a plain misrepresentation of the facts” requiring “an abject correction.” The idea of getting a lesson from Paul Krugman about the ethics of commentary is almost as funny as Fallows’s apologizing on behalf of Harvard. Both these paragons of the commentariat, by the way, shamelessly accused me of racism three years ago when I drew an innocent parallel between President Obama and “Felix the Cat.” I don’t know of many more unethical tricks than to brand someone who criticizes the president a racist.

And, finally, a consolation prize for righteous indignation goes to Dylan Byers of Politico (“ridiculous, misleading, ethically questionable”).

Ouch. That is going to leave a mark.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/author-of-hit-the-road-newsweek-cover-story-skewers-his-critics/

The Deceptive Liberal Media Bias Exposed Again: Ann Romney -vs- Michelle Obama

Hat tip to Fox News for this story

Ann Romney slammed for $990 Shirt, Michelle Obama praised for $6,800 jacket

Back in May, Ann Romney, wife of Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, wore a $990 Reed Krakoff silk shirt for a media appearance. The item of clothing set off a media firestorm, with the Romneys widely accused of being “out of touch” with average Americans.

In particular, the Washington Post wrote that the $990 blouse “will not help her husband change those perceptions, no matter how many Laundromat photo ops are on the campaign’s itinerary.”

Fast forward to last Friday, when First Lady Michelle Obama attended an Olympics reception for heads of state at Buckingham Palace, donning a J. Mendel cap sleeve jacket from the 2013 Resort collection.

The price-tag? $6,800.

This time, the Washington Post simply described the intricacies of the jacket and noted that Mrs. Obama has previously been criticized for “not dressing up enough for Queen Elizabeth II, so she stepped up her game.” No snide remarks, no outrage over the cost, no suggestion she was “out of touch.”

“The media’s overabundant love affair with the Obamas has become increasingly blatant as this election draws nearer. Scrutinizing Mrs. Romney for a fashion choice that cost considerably less than that of the First Lady is yet another example of the media being purely sanctimonious,” former political publicist Angie Meyer told FoxNews.com. “The media continues to relish their roles as liberal bullies, and have relentlessly bullied the Romneys from the beginning. It is pure hypocrisy at its finest.”

Glenn Selig of The Publicity Agency concurred.

“The media will not stay quiet on the issue because wealth remains a big issue with the Romneys. It is not his fault that he’s wealthy, but the media is portraying it as a liability,” Selig said.

Dan Gainor, VP of Business and Culture for Media Research Center in Washington DC, said it’s “just the latest example of a consistent media theme that somehow Romney is too wealthy and out of touch because he’s a millionaire. Except of course that Obama is also a millionaire. “

Some also highlighted the apparent hypocrisy on Twitter. “And you thought the Romneys were out of touch?” tweeted one, while another wondered who had to pay for the almost $7,000 dress, and another balked that the “jacket would put a lot of food on the table of one of the 25M unemployed people in USA.”

Not everyone’s nose was out of joint, however. Media commentator Jenn Hoffman told FoxNews.com that “Americans need to face the fact that with our current system, politicians need to have money. That is how they get into the office in the first place. If you are near the White House, you have access to serious cash and much of that cash is spent on honing your image.”

Mark Joseph, producer of “Wild Card: The Promise & Peril of Sarah Palin,” added that “Mrs. Romney’s wardrobe expenses are certainly fair game, but so are Mrs. Obama’s, and political reporters have got to do a better job of being even-handed.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/08/01/ann-romney-slammed-for-0-shirt-michelle-obama-praised-for-6800-jacket/#ixzz22J2r3IwG

The Media Bias Continues

Related articles

• While Americans Suffer – Michelle Obama Sports $6,800 Jacket to London Soiree (thegatewaypundit.com)
• ABC: No, Ann Romney didn’t say ‘you people’ (hotair.com)
• Michelle Obama in a $6,800 jacket at the London Olympics reception (examiner.com)

President Obama did not Bankrupt America on his own… Someone Helped him!

That’s right!

President Obama did not get the Economy to this Point on his Own

SOMEONE HELPED HIM

ANY QUESTIONS?

Liberal Logic 101: The Slanderous Hypocrisy: (Part Two)

See Part One of this post over at Voting American:
http://votingamerican.wordpress.com/2012/07/10/liberal-logic-101-the-slanderous-hypocrisy-part-one/

MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Doesn’t Apologize for Taking Romney Out of Context

Hat tip to The Blaze for this Story

MSNBC‘s Andrea Mitchell Doesn’t Apologize for Taking Romney Out of Context — Plays More of Clip Instead

You can’t even call this half-hearted.

Andrea Mitchell on Tuesday did not apologize for heavily editing a clip of Mitt Romney (hear her original edit here) talking about a Wawa gas station at a recent campaign stop. Instead, she made an excuse, saying she didn’t get a “chance” to play the whole thing on Monday and played more of the clip to try and soften the blow meant to portray him as out of touch:

The clip Mitchell played Tuesday does offer a little more context, but it should be noted that Mitchell — after laughing at it yesterday — did not take the time to explain the full context: Romney was discussing how private enterprise is more efficient than government.

And all this raises the question: If it was simply a case of Mitchell not having the “chance” to play the full clip on Monday, then why did she even play it in the first place? If the point was to have a fair discussion on Romney and his statements, then there would be no question that she and her team would have played the full clip and given the context.

But I think we know the points wasn’t a fair discussion. It was to get a cheap laugh and mock the former governor. And they achieved their goal.

This time they just got caught.

See the video clips at The Blaze:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/msnbcs-andrea-mitchell-doesnt-apologize-for-taking-romney-out-of-context-plays-more-of-clip-instead/

ANY QUESTIONS ?

Related articles

• MSNBC at it again editing a Romney Speech Video to show him as Out of Touch: Shame on you BS-NBC (twighlightslastgleaming.wordpress.com)
• Offers non-apology apology… (politico.com)
• NBC Busted for Doctoring Romney Tape (rushlimbaugh.com)
• MORE ON MSNBC: MSNBC takes Romney’s “WaWa” remark out of context for the purpose of mockery. Sha… (pjmedia.com)
• Andrea Mitchell Lies About Her Lies (tarpon.wordpress.com)
• Mediaite: Andrea Mitchell Keeps WaWa Story Alive By Pretending It Doesn’t Exist (gestetnerupdates.com)
• Media malpractice: Andrea Mitchell sweeps falsely edited Romney Wawa video under rug (twitchy.com)
• MSNBC’s Selectively-edited Romney Video, Andrea Mitchell’s Non-Apology Illustrate Network’s Dishonesty (newsbusters.org)
• Andrea Mitchell Keeps WaWa-Gate Story Alive By Pretending It Doesn’t Exist (mediaite.com)
• MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Doesn’t Apologize For Romney Wawa Editing (mediaite.com)